EFFECTS OF HETEROGENEITY OF HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY |
Parameters & Legend | Problem Statement | Key Observations | Additional Observations | Mathematical Interpretation |
![]() |
Parameter | Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 |
Geometric mean hydraulic conductivity, Kg (m/day) | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
ln K variance | 0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 3.0 |
Correlation scale, λ (m) | NA | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Porosity, n | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
Local pore-scale dispersivity | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Head difference (m) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Size of model (m) | 200 x 50 | 200 x 50 | 200 x 50 | 200 x 50 |
Covariance function | NA | Exponential | Exponential | Exponential |
Approximate initial plume size (m) | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
Grid | 401 x 407 | 401 x 407 | 401 x 407 | 401 x 407 |
Cell size, Δx (m) | 0.5 x 0.5 | 0.5 x 0.5 | 0.5 x 0.5 | 0.5 x 0.5 |
Time step, Δt(days) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
The model parameters and inputs are explained below:
|
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EFFECTS OF HETEROGENEITY OF HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This video demonstrates the effect of heterogeneous hydraulic conductivity media on the transport of a conservative solute in the absence of pore-scale dispersion. The initial size of the plume is much larger than the scale of heterogeneity. The modeling domain consists of constant head boundaries on the left and right extremes, and no-flow boundaries at the top and bottom. Case 1 has a homogeneous field; and cases 2 through 4 show increasing degrees of heterogeneity. Details are provided in Table 1.1 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The following observations can be made from the video:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The pattern of plume spreading shows a clear trend. The plume does not spread at all when the ln K variance is 0.0, and spreads the most when the ln K variance is 3.0. Even though the plume spreading is enhanced, the mean plume displacement is largely unaffected. The fingers of the plume contain the maximum mass of the plume, but are concentrated over a small spatial area. The tails have less mass, but are elongated. Consequently, the center of mass, and thus mean displacement, remains the same, irrespective of the ln K variance. The effect of the symmetric ln K field on plume spreading is asymmetric. The fingers (leading edge) of the plume are shorter than the tails (trailing edge) of the plume, which results in a skewed plume. This can be explained very simply. High K zones are convergent zones, through which the plume prefers to travel, and in which it converges. Convergence is the opposite of spreading. Therefore, shorter fingers are found. In contrast, low K zones are zones of divergence, which impede the movement of the plume. When a low K zone is encountered, the plume travels around it rather than through it and this results in spreading. If a part of the plume reaches the low K zones, it gets 'trapped' due to the extremely low velocities in that zone. The bulk of the plume continues moving, while the portion trapped in the low K zone is released slowly; thus contributing to tail elongation. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mathematically, these processes can be explained using the following equations. In a heterogeneous field, in the absence of pore-scale dispersion, the conservative solute concentration at any point for any irregular plume realization is given by:
where: C = Concentration; ui = Seepage velocity. To determine large scale behavior, the method of perturbation is used, and on performing local spatial averaging, we get the following:
where: This additional term on the RHS of (1.1.2) reflects the effects of heterogeneity. It can be shown [ Gelhar and Axness, 1983a ] that:
The coefficient Aiiis called macrodispersivity and is given by [ Gelhar, 1993 ]:
where: Substituting (1.1.3a) into (1.1.2), yields:
This is the classical advection-dispersion equation. The additional term on the RHS in (1.1.4) represents macrodispersion. From (1.1.3b), it is evident that with increasing ln K variance, the longitudinal component of macrodispersion will increase. However, there will be no effect on transverse macrodispersion, since no pore-scale dispersion is present.
The mean velocity (
where: K = Mean conductivity; n = Porosity. The mean velocity is given by:
Gelhar ( 1993, equation 4.1.48 ) showed that
where: K ' = Perturbation to mean conductivity; Substituting (1.1.6) into (1.1.5), we get:
Since the geometric mean hydraulic conductivity and mean hydraulic gradient are the same for all cases, |