1Forward Particle Tracking
Step 1 β Load Parent Model and Create Submodel
Click 'Other Tools' > 'LoadModel' > 'Local Model File' to load the parent model domain using a previously saved model file from Tutorial 1 (Steady 2D Flow Modeling). Submit the parent model for simulation ('Simulation tools' > 'SIMULATE') to generate the regional flow solution that will provide boundary conditions for the child model. Then add a submodel (as in Tutorial 2) and apply 'Boundary Conditions from Parent Model'.
Step 2 β Access Particle Tracking Tools
Click the 'ParticleTK' button to access the particle tracking toolkit. Choose
'Particle Line' from the dropdown to release particles along a polyline.
Step 3 β Place Particles
Use the cursor to place polyline vertices with single clicks on the map. The particle polyline appears as a series of bright yellow line segments with circles at the vertex locations. Each vertex becomes a particle release point. Place the polyline perpendicular to the expected flow direction for best visualization of flow patterns.
Step 4 β Submit for Simulation
Click to submit the submodel for simulation. A prompt appears asking to confirm forward tracking β choose 'OK' to apply forward particle tracking. The solver computes flow and traces all particle paths simultaneously.
Step 5 β View Particle Path Lines
Each particle traces a path from its release point to its discharge location, revealing the flow structure of the aquifer β where water travels, how fast, and where it exits the system. Particles and particle path-lines are automatically displayed in the map display when particles are involved in the simulation. Particle tracking options can be specified in the 'Simulation Settings' tab of the 'Domain Attributes' menu.
Step 6 β Save or Publish
Click
to save or publish the model with particle tracking results for future use.
Key Concepts
Multiple release methods: This tutorial demonstrates polyline release. IGW-NET also supports releasing particles as individual points (click to place), within a polygon (area-based), and around a pumping well (capture zone analysis). Each method serves a different analysis purpose.
Forward vs backward tracking: Forward tracking answers "where does this water go?" Backward tracking answers "where does this water come from?" Both use the same computed flow field β only the direction of tracing differs.
Nested model advantage: By performing particle tracking in a nested submodel, you get fine-resolution pathlines with regional-scale boundary conditions. The particles respect the true flow field, not artificial boundaries.
2What's Next
With particle tracking mastered, continue the learning path:
Tutorial 4: Water Balance β analyze where water comes from and where it goes, quantitatively
Tutorial 5: Contaminant Transport β go beyond pathlines to simulate actual plume migration with dispersion and decay
Tutorial 8: Calibration β match your model to observed data before relying on particle tracking for decisions