Water Utilities & Municipalities

Utility water work runs end-to-end: source water through treatment, distribution, customers, wastewater, and discharge. It is the only sector where one operator's responsibility spans every domain MAGNET4WATER's five platforms cover — and the only sector where the regulatory pressures arriving in 2026 touch every domain simultaneously. LCRR lead-service-line clocks running. PFAS MCLs becoming enforceable. IIJA capital flowing. AWIA cybersecurity in the Sanitary Survey. The Silver Tsunami at the door. MAGNET is built for the work the utility actually has to do.

The 2026 utility pressure pattern
LCRR / LCRI

EPA's Lead and Copper Rule Revisions / Improvements finalized 2024. Every system needs an LSL inventory and a 10-year replacement plan. Water-age modeling is now mandatory analysis — not a research exercise. The compliance clock is running.

PFAS NPDWR

EPA finalized National Primary Drinking Water Regulations for PFAS in April 2024. Enforceable MCLs for six compounds effective 2027. Treatment infrastructure capital decisions are being made now — on source-water characterization that must defend the choice.

IIJA capital flowing

$50B+ for water through the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. Allocation decisions face audit-grade scrutiny from EPA, state revolving funds, and GAO. "We picked these projects because…" needs a quantitative answer.

AWIA + cybersecurity

America's Water Infrastructure Act Risk & Resilience Assessment in its second 5-year cycle. Cybersecurity is now explicit in the EPA Sanitary Survey. Customer data, infrastructure details, and AWIA assessments demand a different kind of platform security.

Silver Tsunami

AWWA estimates roughly half of the water-utility workforce is eligible to retire in the next 5–10 years. Decades of system knowledge can leave with a few transitions. Tools that codify methodology and scaffold junior operators are now an HR strategy.

Rate-case affordability

Capital programs are growing while EPA's affordability threshold tightens around the same rate-payer dollars. Rate-case defense in front of a PUC or city council now demands quantitative capital prioritization on the same model that drove the design.

These pressures land on the same utility staff at the same time. The infrastructure that supports the response cannot be six different tools held together by spreadsheets.

What Sets MAGNET Apart

Four architectural decisions that map directly to how utility water actually gets managed end-to-end.

🔄

Source to discharge — one platform.

Source water (IGW-NET for wells; SwaNET for watersheds). Distribution (ConduitNET). Wastewater, sanitary, and stormwater (StormNET). Discharge back to receiving water (SwaNET). Utility water work is end-to-end — and uniquely among MAGNET's sectors, utilities are the ones whose responsibilities span every platform. One environment, one data fabric, one observatory — not six tools held together by file exports.

⚖️

EPA EPANET. EPA SWMM. USGS MODFLOW. USDA SWAT.

ConduitNET runs EPANET — the canonical EPA distribution-network engine. StormNET runs SWMM — FEMA-approved for the National Flood Insurance Program and the EPA-standard CSO and sanitary engine. IGW-NET runs MODFLOW 6 — the USGS groundwater standard. SwaNET runs USDA SWAT for source-water watersheds. The methodology federal science already endorses — defensible at any rate case, sanitary survey, NPDES review, or LCRR compliance audit.

🩻

Water age, LSL priority, LCRR compliance.

ConduitNET's water-age and water-quality module is exactly the LCRR/LCRI compliance instrument. Identify dead-ends, stagnation zones, and high-residence-time sections. The same model that designs the distribution system identifies the LSL priority replacements — with the audit trail the 10-year replacement plan needs. Customer water-quality outcomes drop out of the hydraulics, not the other way around.

🛡️

Confidential computing for utility data.

Customer data. SCADA-connected operational models. AWIA Risk & Resilience Assessments. Infrastructure schematics. Enterprise tier with hardware-enforced confidential computing, organization-managed encryption keys, closed observatories, and dedicated infrastructure options. Cybersecurity baselines that satisfy the Sanitary Survey and procurement teams — without breaking the collaborative workflow operators need.

Right physics for the question

Utility water work spans every physically distinct domain in MAGNET. Each platform uses the engine federal science built for that domain — coupled through documented handoffs of physically-meaningful quantities.

Distribution network
ConduitNET
Pressure zones, fire flow, pump scheduling, water age (LCRR), chlorine decay, energy management, hydraulic-grade-line 3D — EPA EPANET
Sewer, CSO & stormwater
StormNET
Sanitary sewers, combined sewer overflow, FEMA flood inundation, urban drainage, I/I analysis — EPA SWMM, FEMA-approved
Source-water (groundwater)
IGW-NET
Wellhead protection, capture zones, PFAS source-water analysis, sustainable yield, contaminant transport — MODFLOW 6 family
Source-water (surface)
SwaNET
Source-watershed protection, climate-driven yield projection (CMIP6), nutrient loading, drought scenarios — USDA SWAT
Data fabric
DataNET
USGS NWIS, state monitoring, customer SCADA, GIS layers, climate forcing — the operational data already in place
What MAGNET is — and is not

MAGNET4WATER is the source-to-discharge analytical layer for water utilities — on federal-standard engines. It is not a SCADA system (Schneider ClearSCADA, OSIsoft PI System, Emerson, Siemens WinCC), an asset management system (Bentley AssetWise, Maximo, Cityworks, Innovyze InfoAsset Manager), a billing or customer information system (Oracle CC&B, Salesforce, SAP IS-U), or a regulatory compliance reporting platform (eWQR, DMR-QA, state-specific reporting portals). Those remain the operational technology, asset management, billing, and compliance-reporting infrastructure utilities run on. What MAGNET adds is the analytical and planning layer connecting all five water streams: source-water sustainability and contamination (SwaNET + IGW-NET), distribution-system modeling (ConduitNET on EPA EPANET), stormwater (StormNET on EPA SWMM), and the cross-platform integration that ties source-to-discharge planning together for capital allocation, climate-adaptation, and multi-decade source-water sustainability decisions.

Pain Points & MAGNET Solutions

1

LCRR lead service line replacement at scale

Every system needs an LSL inventory, a replacement plan, and water-age analysis to prioritize the work. The 10-year clock is running. IIJA funding allocation requires defensible prioritization, not arbitrary alphabetical lists

MAGNET: ConduitNET (EPA EPANET) computes water age, residence time, dead-end identification, and stagnation zones across the distribution system. The same model that operates the system identifies the LSL priority replacements — with the audit trail the 10-year plan needs and the documentation IIJA allocation reviewers expect.

2

PFAS source-water characterization & treatment planning

The new MCLs are enforceable in 2027. Treatment infrastructure capital decisions — GAC, ion exchange, reverse osmosis — rest on source-water characterization that defends both the choice and the design

MAGNET: IGW-NET with MT3DMS reactive contaminant transport for groundwater-source utilities; SwaNET with NPS source analysis for surface-source utilities. MODPATH particle tracking for source attribution from compliance wells. Defensible source-water characterization on the engines federal science already endorses — survives both regulator review and the litigation that increasingly follows.

3

CSO consent-decree compliance

Many older cities are under multi-decade EPA consent decrees mandating combined-sewer-overflow reduction. Each project contributes to or compromises the long-term compliance trajectory — tracked under continuing federal oversight

MAGNET: StormNET handles stormwater, sanitary, and combined sewers as one infrastructure with full 1D unsteady Saint-Venant hydraulics; 8 LID types with multi-layer physics. The same model that designs the projects produces the consent-decree compliance documentation — not three separate consultant deliverables that can contradict each other.

4

Rate-case capital justification

Capital programs are growing while affordability constraints tighten. State PUCs, city councils, and rate-payer advocates challenge every capital project. Defensible prioritization is the binding constraint on what gets funded

MAGNET: Live CAPEX, OPEX, and lifecycle-cost feedback across 258 regional cost presets, integrated with hydraulic and water-quality outcomes. Resize the asset; the cost responds and the service-quality outcome responds together. Rate-case capital justification on the same model that drives the design — not a separate spreadsheet defending it after the fact.

5

AWIA risk & resilience & cybersecurity

Second 5-year AWIA cycle. EPA Sanitary Survey now includes cybersecurity. CISA water-sector advisories. Customer data, SCADA-connected models, and infrastructure schematics demand platform security that procurement teams sign off on

MAGNET: Enterprise tier with hardware-enforced confidential computing, organization-managed encryption keys, closed observatories, and dedicated infrastructure options. Standard tier already encrypts in transit and at rest with three key-management modes. The controls procurement needs to see — on a platform operators want to use.

6

Workforce continuity & operator scaffolding

AWWA's Silver Tsunami estimate: roughly half the water-utility workforce is eligible to retire in the next 5–10 years. The system knowledge that lives in long-tenured operators is leaving. Small and rural utilities — tens of thousands of them — face the same crisis with 1–2 staff

MAGNET: The federal-standard engines underneath every analysis; format wrangling and projection-mismatch debugging removed. AI assistants trained on platform documentation that answer questions in natural language. Institutional methodology gets codified in the platform configuration — not in retiring operators' notebooks. Junior staff produce senior-quality work with the scaffolding the platform provides.

Strategic Value

For utility executives and municipal water leaders, the architectural commitments translate into three dimensions: regulatory compliance defensibility — LCRR, PFAS, AWIA, CSO consent decree, and NPDES all rest on the same defensible model on federal-standard engines; capital allocation under affordability constraints — rate-case defense and IIJA justification on quantitative cost-benefit reasoning produced as the design changes; and workforce continuity — codified methodology that survives the Silver Tsunami and AI-scaffolded operations that keep small and rural utilities operationally viable.

When Michigan EGLE replaced site-by-site contracting with a unified MAGNET deployment for statewide wellhead protection, the documented savings reached approximately $30M in taxpayer dollars — with methodology consistency across every community water system, not just the ones the budget could afford. That is the architectural payoff applied at utility scale.

Proven for Utilities

Three deployments — statewide source-water protection, source-water crisis discovery, and portfolio-scale methodology.

Launch Platform Consulting Partner See Pricing
For utility executives and municipal water leaders

Managing utility water work across LCRR replacement, PFAS treatment deployment, AWIA risk assessments, CSO consent-decree obligations, and IIJA capital allocation — where regulatory deadlines, capital constraints, and workforce attrition all arrive at the same staff, in the same year? Read the strategic argument for why the water-resources digital transformation moment is now — and why the multi-tier, multi-scale framework is a viable response at the scale of utility operations.

Read: The Inflection Point →
← Sectors↑ TopCase Studies →